Tag Archives: Rochester New York

American, Born Hungary – George Eastman Museum Photo Exhibit

Driving for Deco is taking a brief intermission from our posts on the 17th World Congress on Art Deco© to highlight an exhibit currently at the George Eastman Museum in Rochester, NY – American, Born Hungary.

“American, Born Hungary: Kertész, Capa, and the Hungarian American Photographic Legacy examines the pioneering artistry that emerged out of the backdrops of persecution and perseverance. The exhibit follows a remarkable number of émigrés and exiles from Hungary to Berlin and Paris, and then on to New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles, where they reinvented themselves and American photography. More than 150 stunning and surreal photographs capture the unexpected beauty of fleeting shadows, gritty urban life, glamorous celebrities, and the promise of America. Included are works by such notable artists such as André Kertész, György Kepes, László Moholy-Nagy, Martin Munkácsi, and Nickolas Muray.” – Exhibit Brochure

The main entrance to the George Eastman Museum.

The Thomas Tischer Visitor Center / ESL Federal Credit Union Pavilion main entrance to the George Eastman Museum.

I had originally planned to see this exhibition in Virginia in the autumn of 2024. But later, I learned that it would be traveling to the George Eastman Museum in Rochester in 2025. And this which meant I could simply wait and catch it right where I work. It is organized by the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts and curated by Alex Nyerges, director and CEO of VMFA, in collaboration with Károly Kincses, founding director of the Hungarian Museum of Photography. The exhibition has been on view since late September and will close on March 1, 2026.

I attended the opening preview party back in September and fully intended to return later to experience it at a more leisurely pace. As time began to run out, a very cold, snowy Saturday morning in January finally provided the opportunity.

Featuring over 150 photographs, the exhibition traces the photographers’ journeys from their native Hungary across Europe and on to the United States, from the 1920s through the 1960s. For this post, I’ve chosen a selection of favorite images from the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s.

Itt a Balaton! (Here is Lake Balaton!), ca. 1932.

Itt a Balaton! (Here is Lake Balaton!), ca. 1932.

Itt a Balaton!, collage with gelatin silver prints and gouache, by the married artistic team of Imre Révész (1895–1975) and Irma Biró (dates unknown–1944).

Révész began his career as a war photographer before opening a portrait studio in the 1920s. Soon after, the couple expanded into advertising photography. Their early work was influenced by the soft-focus landscapes associated with the “Hungarian style,” but by the late 1920s they embraced collage and abstraction.

The pair divorced in 1934, after which Révész moved to the United States, where he continued a successful career in fashion and advertising photography. Despite the divorce, he continued to sign his work as “Révész–Biró,” possibly as an homage to Biró, who was murdered at Auschwitz in 1944.

Optigram (ca. 1948) Révész-Biró.

Optigram (ca. 1948) Révész-Biró.

Three of the most compelling photographs on view from the Bauhaus years are cameraless images, or photograms, by László Moholy-Nagy (1895 – 1946). Although the photogram process predates the 1839 introduction of photography, its use as a means of producing abstract imagery emerged in the 1920s.

Several artists—including Man Ray, Christian Schad, and El Lissitzky—have laid claim to reinventing the process. Moholy-Nagy’s wife Lucia, however, defended her husband’s role in its 1922 reinvention. He is widely credited with naming the process “photogram”.

Photogram, 1925 - László Moholy-Nage

Photogram, 1925 – László Moholy-Nage.

 

Moholy-Naigy, along with his wife Lucia Moholy, began creating photograms around 1922. An object is placed directly onto light-sensitive photographic paper and exposed to light—such as the antique postal scale seen in Untitled (1929. This produces an image without the use of a camera. These works are among the finest examples of Modernist abstraction in photography.

I really love these photographs. As I’ve gotten older (or just old), I’ve grown to appreciate the avant-garde of the 1920s and 1930s more and more. But the next section of American, Born Hungary, was easily my favorite—and you’ll know why.

The New York section presents a mix of published photographs alongside more intimate snapshots taken by these émigrés.

Arnold Eagle's photograph - Under the Third Avenue EL.

Arnold Eagle (1909 – 1992). Under the Third Avenue EL, North of 27th St., New York, 1939.

Another Arnold Eagle photograph - Untitled (Boy at Window), 1935.

Another Arnold Eagle photograph – Untitled (Boy at Window), 1935.

Above is a group of four photographs by John Albok (1894 – 1982). Clockwise from top left

  • Mischief Makers – July 4, Central Park, 1945
  • Fifth Avenue, NYC, Depression, Forsake, 1933
  • City Fruit Garden, 1934
  • Raining, 1938

 

Bill Robinson at a Baseball Game in Harlem, 1936

Lucien Aigner (1901–1999) photographed the dapper Bill “Bojangles” Robinson (1878–1949) attending a New York Giants game at the Polo Grounds. Robinson is widely regarded as one of the greatest tap dancers of all time. He is best remembered today for his famous stair-dancing routine with Shirley Temple.

New York, Downtown, 1945 - 1955. Anna Barna (1901 - 1963).

New York, Downtown, 1945 – 1955. Anna Barna (1901 – 1963).

André Kertész's (1894 - 1985), born in Hungary, - 1937 picutre Lost Cloud.

André Kertész (1894 – 1985) – Lost Cloud, 1937

Kertész considered Lost Cloud a something as a self portrait. He and his wife came to New York in 1936 by the promise of a lucrative fashion photography contract. The contract fell through soon after their arrival in America. While Kertész struggled to find work, he saw this solitary cloud passing by the RCA Building at Rockefeller Center. Later recalling the cloud he remarked that he was “very touched” because it “did not know which way to go.”

The exhibition also features photographs of famous figures from the 1920s–1940s, capturing the public faces of the era.

I want to end this post with a group of four photographs by György Kepes from the late 1930s.  Kepes was teaching at the Institute of Design (the New Bauhaus) when these images were made, While there he was actively developing his concept of integrated design—bringing together art, craft, and technology in what he called “the education of vision.”

Clockwise from the left

  • Untitled (Photograph for Direction Magazine), 1939
  • Chicago, 1937
  • Untitled, 1939
  • Target and Cone, ca. 1939

If you happen to find yourself in Rochester before March 1, I highly recommend stopping in to see this terrific exhibition. It will not disappoint.

Anthony (one half of the Freakin’, Tiquen Guys)

A Little Rochester Art Deco: The Little Theatre

The Little Theatre at 240 East Avenue, Rochester, NY.

The Little Theatre 240 East Avenue, Rochester, NY. Photo by the authors.

September 29th was Silent Movie Day and to honor it the Little Theatre in Rochester, New York screened G. W. Pabst’s 1929 film Pandora’s Box. Starring silent film icon Louise Brooks the film played in historic theatre 1 which will be celebrating its 95th anniversary on October 17th. I haven’t been to Little Theatre 1 since before the pandemic and its 2020 Art Deco renovation. So this was the perfect excuse for me to go see the theatre and a great film as well.

The front of the Little Theatre on East Avenue.

The Little Theatre’s East Avenue facade. Photo by the authors.

The Little Theatre Movement

In the 1920s as the American film industry, through large studios like Paramount and First National, began an almost monopolistic control on making and exhibiting motion pictures a new type of theatre emerged. The Little Theatre movement, created by the Motion Picture Theatre Guild, was a direct response to mainstream cinema. These theatres would program European imports and more experimental domestic films and cater to the intellectuals. By the end of the decade Little Theatres were opening in most major American cities with Rochester, New York’s opening in the autumn of 1929.

 

The Little Theatre on East Avenue in Rochester, NY, 1929.

The Little Theatre shortly before opening in October, 1929. Photo from beroachitecture.com

The Little Theatre, Rochester, New York

Rochester’s Little Theatre was typical of the size of other “Little Theatres”, having seating of less than 500, unlike the several thousand seating capacity of mainstream picture palaces. Another feature of these theatres was to offer patrons free coffee and cigarettes and lounges to intellectually discuss films. Edgar Phillips and Frederick Pike designed the Little in the new modern style just becoming popular in the United States. The East Avenue facade is of polished, black terracotta tiles.  Breaking up the dark facade are cast, aluminum inserts.

Cast aluminum decorations over a doorway in the front of the Little Theatre.

One of the cast aluminum decorations on the Little’s facade. Photo by the author.

And includes a frieze of stylized flora over the second story windows. Thanks to the Art Deco facade the theatre has been placed on the National Register of Historic Places.

A section of the second story stylized frieze.

A section of the stylized frieze over the second floor windows. Photo by the authors.

 

Premiere engagement newspaper ad for the Little Theatre, October, 1929.

Advertisement of the Little’s premiere week. Image from Democrat & Chronicle, October 20, 1929.

The Little’s original mission was to be a venue for the fast dying art of the silent film. Nicknamed the “House of Silent Shadows” the opening program included the Italy / French co-production of Cyrano de Bergerac (Dir. Augusto Genina, 1923). The lavish, stencil color production was accompanied by a three-man orchestra playing from upper left balcony.

Frame capture from the DVD of the 1923 film Cyrano de Bergerac.

Frame from Cyrano de Bergerac (Augusto Genina, 1923). Frame capture from the Image DVD.

With the onset of the Great Depression not long after the Little Theatre’s opening, concessions to its mission were necessary, and sound equipment installed. With the conversion to sound, a marquee was added to the exterior in 1931.

The Little Theatre showing the 1931 marquee addition.

The 1931 marquee during the run of Rome Express in 1932. Image from cinematreasures.org.

The next change to the theatre’s exterior came right after the end of the Second World War, when a new “zigzag” vertical sign replaced the original one.

The East Avenue facade of the Little Theatre with the 1946 vertical sign.

The Little Facade showing the 1940s vertical sign. Photo by the authors.

The Little’s interior has seen more changes through the years than the outside. Originally the seat configuration features two sections with a center aisle down the middle. Cylindrical wall sconces lined the auditorium walls. The downstairs lounge while comfortable was not especially moderne in style.

Photos showing the original interior of the Little Theatre.

Photos of the Little’s original interior design as featured in the 20th anniversary booklet from 1949. Photos from cinematreasures.org.

Ownership of The Little changed through the years, at one time becoming part of Jo-Mor Theatre chain. In the 1980s coming under new management headed by William Coppard and John and Pam Blanpied, the Little’s original mission as an art house was restored.

The auditorium’s interior had undergone alterations by the 1980s as well. Seating now was in three sections a large center section and two smaller sections along the walls. Gone were the original seats and wall sconces. This would change with a 2019-2020 renovation / restoration. While not an authentic restoration bringing the theatre back to its 1929 appearance, it is a thoughtful renovation, that captures the spirit of the 1920s Little.

Little Theatre Entrance.

Little Theatre entrance. Photo by the authors.

Lobby

Reproduction milk glass shades in the Little's lobby.

Reproduction of 1920s / 1930s milk glass shades in the entrance lobby. Photo by the authors.

1920s inspired mirror and poster case.

1920s inspired mirror and poster case. Photo by the authors.

Inner lobby ceiling lights.

Art Deco inspired ceiling lights on the ceiling of the inner lobby. Photo by the authors.

Inner lobby.

Renovated inner lobby. Photo by the authors.

Inner lobby corner and stairs down to the lounge.

Inner lobby corner and stairs to the downstairs lounge and restrooms. Photo by the authors.

Downstairs Lounge

Stairs to the lounge.

Stairs leading (with original 1929 railings) to the downstairs lounge. Photo by the authors.

Downstairs lounge

Downstairs lounge with Streamline Moderne inspired furniture and a reproduction Art Deco ceiling light and wall sconces. Photo by the authors.

Detail of the reproduction ceiling in the downstairs lounge.

Detail of the reproduction ceiling in the downstairs lounge. Photo by the authors.

Auditorium

Side wall of the auditorium.

Side wall of the auditorium with new wall sconces reminiscent of the original 1929 lighting. Photo by the authors.

Detail of auditorium wall sconce.

Detail of auditorium wall sconce. Photo by the authors.

The new auditorium seats.

The new seats with Art Deco inspired upholstery, mimic the shape of the original 1929 seats. Photo by the authors.

Looking toward the screen.

Looking toward the screen in the renovated auditorium. Photo by the authors.

So if you happen to be in Rochester and want to see a movie check out what’s playing at the Little. And maybe there will be a screening of a classic film in Little 1, if so, don’t miss it.

The Little Theatre 240 East Avenue.

The Little Theatre, Rochester, New York. Photo by the authors.

Anthony & Chris (The Freakin’, Tiquen Guys)

 

Sources:

Wayne, Peter; “Small but Mighty”; City; 2024, October; pp 10 – 11.

Cinema Treasures