Tag Archives: Ginger Rogers

How About a Chaser? Chase Gaiety Cocktail Set

 

The Chase, Brass & Copper Co. met the end of Prohibition with a number of stylish cocktail accessories. For this post Driving For Deco will take a look at the first of the Chase cocktail set that helped  lift spirits (figuratively & literally) during the Depression.

 

The Gaiety Cocktail Set

1933 – 1942

Cocktail Shaker

Entirely modern in its appearance, it retains the usefulness of old fashioned shakers.The top is fitted with a sleeve which fits snuggly into the pouring lip when shaking to prevent the leaking or spilling of contents. A strainer is also provided to hold back the mint, lemon or other solids. Finished in bright chromium with black enamel rings at the top and bottom. – 1934 Chase Catalog.

 

The typical Chase Gaiety Cocktail set, featuring the shaker with black painted bands.

Chase Gaiety Cocktail Set. Shaker, tray and cocktail cups. Image from ebay.

By far, this has to be the easiest of all the Chase cocktail sets to find. The cocktail shaker and cups are readily available in the collector’s market. The tray can be found with a bit of hunting.

 

The patent application drawing for the Chase Gaiety Cocktail Shaker.

Patent for the Reichenbach’s Chase Gaiety Cocktail Shaker. Image from Google Patents.

The shaker, designed by Howard F. Reichenbach (1902 – 1959) in 1933, is classic moderne. Its most notable decorative feature is impressed, painted bands, on the body and lid. On the lid, two raised concentric circles lead to the finial. A Bakelite ring is at the base of the chrome finial.

The lid of the shaker sits snuggly on the neck of the body. Inside the neck is a removable strainer. The Chase centaur trademark is on the bottom of the shaker.

 

he Gaiety Shaker patent drawing showing the interior of the lid, the neck and the strainer.

Chase Gaiety Cocktail Shaker patent drawing illustrating the interior of the lid, the neck and the strainer. Image from Google Patents.

Cocktail Cups

Simplicity is an outstanding feature in the design of this distinctive cocktail cup, but it is the simplicity of line and decoration that suggests sophistication and good taste. – 1934 Chase Catalog.

 

Harry Laylon's cocktail cups for the Chase Specialty Line.

Chase Cocktail Cups designed by Harry Laylon. From the collection of the author.

Retailing at only $0.50 each ($10.75 in 2022), these simple cups, a Harry Laylon (1911 – 1997) design,  must have been very popular.  One can easily find these cocktail cups on the collector’s market today.

 

Cocktail Tray

This simple tray is ideal for use with cocktail cups, but may be used equally as well with other cocktail service pieces. It comes individually packed in either polished chromium or polished copper finish. – 1934 Chase Catalog.

 

The tray for the Chase Gaiety cocktail set.

Chase Gaiety Cocktail Tray. Image from thehourshop.com.

In the mid-1930s one of Kool Cigarettes offered premium coupons to its smokers. And the Chase Gaiety Cocktail Set complete or in individual pieces was a premium. 200 coupons for the shaker, 125 coupons for four cocktail cups and 125 coupons for the tray. 400 coupons would get one the entire set, not to mention a chance at smoking related diseases.

Mid-1930s Kool Cigarette advertisement.

Mid-1930s Kool Cigarette magazine advertisement, offering the Chase Gaiety Cocktail set as a premium. Image from ebay.

When purchasing any of the pieces of the Gaiety set there are a few things to keep an eye out for. Let’s start with the shaker. The Gaiety Cocktail shaker is so readily available, at flea markets, antique malls and online, there is no reason to buy one in less than good condition. Often the strainer that sits in the neck of the shaker is missing.

 

Strainer and lid detail of the Chase Gaiety Cocktail Shaker.

Detail of the strainer and the lid finial of the Gaiety Cocktail Shaker. Image from 1stDibs.com.

Make sure the Bakelite ring on the finial is not chipped or missing altogether. The paint in the impressed bands should be not be flaking off. And because of the shaker’s shape and lack of handles it must have been slippery when filled with ice and liquid, which means that a good number of the shakers have dents and surface scratches.

 

Dent on a Gaiety Cocktail Shaker.

Dent in a Gaiety Cocktail Shaker. Image from Ebay.

Detail of damage on a Gaiety Cocktail Shaker.

Detail of the dent and surface scratches on a Chase Gaiety Cocktail Shaker. Image from Ebay.

 

Things to watch for with the cups are dents and splits in them along the sides. Issues with the tray can include bends and dents. Sometimes the chrome plating has worn away exposing the brass base metal. All these issues will affect the value of the pieces.

 

Split in the side of the Chase Gaiety cocktail cup.

Split common to the Chase Gaiety cocktail cup. Image from federalcoinexchange.com

 

And speaking of values, the prices for the Gaiety pieces are all over the place. The Shaker, alone, sells anywhere on the collector’s market from, $25.00 (sometimes even lower) – $450.00. In our opinion any price over $45.00 is too much for a shaker this common. But there is one exception to this rule, but more about that later. The cocktail cups can run in the $7.00 – $15.00 a piece range. The tray is so hard to find, that as of the writing of this article, we have not found one as a stand alone. And complete sets fall into the $150.00 – $450.00 price range, in online stores. Although sometimes they can go higher, one dealer, selling through 1stdibs.com is selling the shaker and four cups for $895.00. This seems high, but the pieces are in mint condition and come with their original packaging.

 

Gaiety Cocktail Shaker and Cups with their original boxes.

Chase Gaiety Cocktail Shaker and Cocktail Cups with their original boxes. Image from 1stdibs.com.

What is really rare regarding the Gaiety Cocktail set are shakers with colored stripes and Bakelite ring on the finial. They were only produced between 1939 and the discontinuation of the line in 1942. The available colors were red, green, blue and white. These are so rare that we have never come across one “in the wild”, only online. A set of three sold at 1stdibs for $3,900.00.

Gaiety Cocktail Shakers in green, red and blue.

Gaiety Cocktail Shakers in green, red and blue. Image from 1stdibs.com.

 

Gaiety in the Movies

The Gaiety Cocktail Shaker, to the best of my knowledge, made its movie debut in the 1934 film, Change of Heart (Directed by John G. Blystone for the Fox Film Corporation). Though the shaker is not one of the stars of the film, that goes to Janet Gaynor, Charles Farrell, James Dunn and Ginger Rogers. It is used by Ginger Rogers trying to woo Charles Farrell from Janet Gaynor. Below are some frame grabs showing the shaker in action.

 

So if you are into Chase items or into cocktail collectibles, the Gaiety Cocktail Shaker or set is a good way to begin. It is classic in streamline Deco looks and it is often affordable.

Cheers till next time.

Anthony & Chris (The Freakin’, Tiquen Guys).

SOURCES

The Complete Chase – Donald-Brian Johnson & Leslie Piña

The Chase Era 1933 and 1942 Catalogs of the Chase Brass & Copper Co. – Donald-Brian Johnson & Leslie Piña

Chase Catalogs 1934 and 1935 Catalogs – Donald-Brian Johnson & Leslie Piña

Art Deco Chrome Book 2: A Collector’s Guide Industrial Design in the Chase Era – Richard J. Kilbride

 

 

 

 

Swing Time – The Pinnacle of a Series

The opening title for Swing Time (1936)

Swing Time Main Title

 

On August 27, 1936, swarms of people lined up outside the Radio City Music Hall. They stood patiently to see the latest film of the greatest dance team the movies had created, Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers. Swing Time, would be their sixth pairing in less than three years.

 

Herald-Tribune newspaper ad for Swing Time

Opening day advertisement for Swing Time. The New York Herald-Tribune 8/27/36

 

Swing Time is musical film perfection. The terrific score by Jerome Kern and Dorothy Fields has left us with two lasting standards A Fine Romance and  The Way You Look Tonight, the 1936 Academy Award winner for best song. The supporting cast included past Astaire-Rogers’ series regulars Eric Blore, as a fussy dance studio owner and Helen Broderick as Ginger Roger’s wise cracking friend. Musical stage veteran Victor Moore, new to the series, played Fred Astaire’s bumbling magician side kick buddy. Also in the cast, George Metaxa as the band leader who rivals for Ginger Rogers affection. Betty Furness, as Fred Astaire’s fiancée and Landers Stevens the father of the jilted fiancée and off-screen the father of the film’s director, George Stevens.

 

 

Then there is the dancing.  Pick Yourself Up,  is the hot duet.  This was a  feature of their films starting with The Gay Divorcee. Where as the previous hot duets had several changes of tempo, Pick Yourself Up, has only one. A very driving, exciting tempo. The dance culminates in the pair lifting each other back and forth over the dance floor’s low railing.

 

 

Waltz in Swing Time is the dance that is up next and like Pick Yourself Up, it too is in one tempo. Arlene Croce wrote in The Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers Book (1972) about Waltz in Swing Time:  “. . . the Waltz has no special story to tell. It is pure white: pure vision and sound. Nevertheless, it is one of those grand, impassioned moonlit dances, and it just flies – it’s the brio of romance. Two minutes  and 45 seconds of unspeakable delight.” As Fred Astaire says just before this number – “This is the moment I’ve been waiting for!” And so has the audience.

 

 

Fred Astaire’s big solo dance number is Bojangles of Harlem, a tribute to the famous dancer, Bill Robinson (1878-1949). Hermes Pan, Astaire’s dance assistant since Flying Down to Rio in 1933 created this Academy Award nominated number. In a career spanning 77 years it is his only appearance in black face. Not to condone the use of black face, at least this number attempts to rise above the stereotypical caricatures of the time. The number tries to be a respectful homage of one artist to another. But it makes it difficult for present day audiences to appreciate.  Astaire gives an interpretation of not Bill Robinson but rather of John W. Bubbles (real name John William Sublett). Astaire considered Sublett the greatest tap dancer of the time. Sublett even gave tap lesson to Astaire in the 1920’s. For Bojangles of Harlem Astaire dresses and dances in the style of Sublett’s character of Sportin’ Life from Porgy and BessBojangles of Harlem is a number in three sections. First the chorus girls dance out from behind sliding doors. Another set of doors open to reveal a pair of gigantic legs, the chorus girls part the legs and we see Astaire sitting on top of a miniature “Harlem”. Astaire and the girls dance. The first section ends with the girls dancing off into the wings.

 

 

The second section starts with the last set of doors opening up to a movie screen. Onto the screen three giant silhouettes of Astaire fade into view. Astaire, in front of the screen dances in and out of synch with the silhouettes. With Bojangles of Harlem, Astaire-Pan employed trick photography for the first time in a dance routine. The shadow idea came to Pan one day on the sound stage while waiting for Astaire to arrive. Three lights at the top of stage cast three shadows on the wall. When Astaire entered the stage Pan showed him the shadows and said it would be fun to add that to the number. Astaire wondered how they could accomplish the effect. Vernon  L. Walker, RKO special effects specialist explained “All you do is get Astaire in front of a screen and photograph his shadows first. Then we take those shadows and make a split screen, and then we photograph Astaire doing the same routine in front of them.”  According to the American Film Institute Catalog entry for Swing Time: “Astaire first danced in front of a blank white screen onto which a strong Sun Arc lamp projected a single shadow. Then he performed the “foreground” dance under normal lighting and in front of another blank screen. This dance was combined optically with the shadow dance, which had been tripled optically in the lab. Simultaneity was achieved by having Astaire watch a projected version of the shadow dance while he performed the foreground dance.” Knowing the Bojangles of Harlem special effects process would require extra time, the number was shot after regular shooting wrapped.  It took three long days to film.

 

 

After the silhouettes leave the screen, Astaire begins the final section of Bojangles of Harlem. For this section Astaire taps and claps his hands in two different rhythms that are off rhythm with the music. Before the audience has a chance to grasp the complexity of all of it, Astaire wraps it up and exits the stage. It is an amazing routine.

 

 

The ultimate number in the film also became the ultimate number of the entire Astaire-Rogers series.  Never Gonna Dance is the most complex dance routine of all their films. The song itself cannot exist outside the context of the film, but it sets the mood for the dance. To quote again from Croce: “In the film it is the end of the affair, in life it is the end of Astaire and Rogers’ Golden Age. On two stage levels linked by glistening staircases there now takes place the supreme dramatic event of the series, a duet moving through a succession of darkening emotions and abrupt rhythmic changes in which we see unfold in dance the story of the film.” Because of the complexity of the dance, Never Gonna Dance became the last sequence shot for Swing Time, in the regular shooting schedule. In previous dances Astaire and Rogers had danced over furniture or up and down a few steps. With this dance they danced up two long flights of stairs on opposite sides of the set. Filming went on all day and then into the early hours of the next morning. Half way through the filming, Rogers’ feet began to bleed. All wanted to call it quits, but Rogers insisted that they finish that night so they could rest the next day. The 47th take was the charm.

 

 

At the helm of Swing Time was George Stevens. At the time Stevens was the top director on the RKO lot. The year before he successfully directed Katharine Hepburn in Alice Adams. Up to this time Mark Sandrich directed most of the Astaire-Rogers films. Pandro S. Berman, RKO production head, originally intended that Sandrich and Stevens would alternately direct these films. Berman’s plan did not come to fruition and Swing Time became the only one directed by Stevens. Stevens’ began his career as a cinematography and later a director at the Hal Roach Studio. He learned his craft well and this training served him in a career that would last over forty years and include such classics as Gunga Din (1939), Woman of the Year (1942), A Place in the Sun (1951) and Giant (1956).

 

 

The floor of the remodeled Silver Sandal.

The stylized city on the floor in front of the orchestra stand in the remodeled Silver Sandal.

 

Van Nest Polglase head of the art department at RKO and his assistant Carroll Clark designed the sets of all the Astaire-Rogers film up to 1938’s Carefree. And all the films through 1937 had one huge set piece. Affectionately known as the “big white set”, this always served as the background for the big dance number. “Big white set” examples are seaside hotel of The Gay Divorcee, the fashion salon in Roberta and the Venice set of Top Hat. The big set pieces in Swing Time are loose adaptations of some actual night clubs. The Silver Sandal in the film derives its name from the Manhattan prohibition era club, The Silver Slipper. A remodeling of the club, midway through the film gives it an even more sleek, moderne appearance.

 

The first Silver Sandal set.

The Silver Sandal set as it appears in the earlier part of Swing Time.

 

On screen credit for the second Silver Sandal set and the Bojangles of Harlem costumes went to John Harkrider. That credit is only somewhat true. Harkrider only “designed” the part of the set seen in the Bojangles of Harlem number. A number photographed on a different stage from the Silver Sandal set. Credit for the Silver Sandal sets goes to Polglase and Carroll.

 

 

Club Raymond is an amalgam of two actual night clubs The Clover Club and The Rainbow Room. The Clover Club on Sunset Boulevard in Hollywood did offer its patrons illegal gambling, like Club Raymond. But the obvious inspiration was The Rainbow Room, the very swank restaurant on the 65th floor of the RCA Building. Even the view from Club Raymond was the view from the Rainbow Room.

 

 

Aside from the art direction the sets featured some of the best designs in moderne style furnishings. Fred Astaire’s character’s dressing room among all the other Art Deco items has a terrific chrome tube chair. The chair made by the Lloyd Loom Manufacturing Company was a creation of the industrial designer KEM Weber.

 

Silver Sandal dressing room.

A dressing room in the Silver Sandal. Betty Furness sitting in a KEM Weber designed chair.

 

The desk lamp, prominently featured in this scene is a product of the Markel Corporation of Buffalo, New York. This lamp today sells between $500.00 – $1,000.00.

 

Markel Desk Lamp

Sitting on the desk is a rare Markel Corporation lamp.

 

Other wonderful sets and furnishings include, George Metaxa’s suite. A very sleek bachelor apartment.

 

 

And the dance studio, the obvious place for the romance to start in an Astaire-Rogers film.

 

 

Swing Time marked the artistic high of the RKO musicals of Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers.  But the financial high had already been hit with Top Hat the year before. Swing Time would be the last film to use the formula that had started with The Gay Divorcee (1934) and repeated in Top Hat. Roberta (1935) and Follow the Fleet  (1936) shared a different plot formula. Starting with 1937’s Shall We Dance the writers looked for inspiration outside of the insular world of the previous Astaire-Rogers films. While all the RKO Astaire-Rogers films are good at worst and near sublime at best, Swing Time marks the end of the Golden Age for the series.

 

 

The final clinch.

Swing Time – The final clinch.

 

 

End Credit

Swing Time End Credit

 

Anthony & Chris (The Freakin’, Tiquen’ Guys)

 

If you liked this post, you might enjoy these earlier posts:

Art Deco meets Italian Futurism

Modernistic Background for Zaniness