Madam Satan

Madan Satan - AFI Centennial Celebration

April 26, 2025

Recently, Anthony and I had the great honor of being asked by the Film Club of the Art Deco Society of Washington D.C. (ADSW) and the American Film Institute (AFI) to introduce the 1930 movie, Madam Satan, the final film in their series Art Deco on Screen: A Centennial Celebration.

Madam Satan

Title Card for our presentation

To say we were somewhat nervous to take on this assignment is an understatement. With a list of points to hit, and a 12-minute time limit, we set to work.

With a lot of writing, rewriting, editing, moving sections, more editing and reworking dialog almost to the very end, we finally came up with a streamlined, informative, at times humorous (we hoped) and mercifully short presentation.

And so, for those who were unable to attend our presentation, sit back and enjoy.

MGM Logo

The MGM Logo

Madan Satan is a pre-code, 1930 MGM movie.  This was Cecil B. DeMille’s 60th film and the second of a three-picture contract with MGM which included Dynamite in 1929 and his second re-make of The Squaw Man in 1931.

Madan Satan

Title Card of Madam Satan

Written by Jeanie MacPherson, Gladys Unger and Elsie Janis, Madam Satan is DeMille’s only musical.

DeMille wanted Cole Porter to write the music but, “he was busy”. His next choices – Oscar Hammerstein, Rudolf Friml, and Sigmund Romberg – all wanted a cut of the profits.

Madam Satan

Cast and Music Credits

So, Clifford Grey, Herbert Stothart, Elsie Janis and Jack King got the job.

Madam Satan

Director Title Card

Madam Satan isn’t quite sure what it wants to be, as it is a marriage of a bedroom farce and a disaster film.

Think the “Real Housewives” of (enter a city here).

Madam Satan

Preproduction Casting

Going into pre-production and casting in the fall of 1929, DeMille really wanted Gloria Swanson in the leading role but was unable to lure her away from United Artists and Joseph Kennedy – remember that name. Kennedy was Swanson’s paramour at the time.

DeMille previously worked with Kay Johnson in Dynamite and after a long search he settled on her for the lead.

However, in a press release, DeMille was quoted as saying she was his first choice and he couldn’t imagine anyone else in the role. Still, actually not his first choice, he was pleased with her performance and contribution to the film.

CECIL B. DeMILLE

Cecile B. DeMille

Cecile B. DeMille (photo form the web)

DeMille had been a fixture in Hollywood since his first silent film, The Squaw Man produced by The Jesse L Lasky Feature Play Company in 1914.

The Squaw Man

DeMille’s three versions of The Squaw Man

By 1916 Lasky’s company merged with Adolph Zukor’s Famous Players in Famous Plays under the Paramount Pictures umbrella. In 1918, DeMille remade The Squaw Man for the first time, also a silent film.

The Ten Commandments

Ten Commandments (photo from britannica.com)

By the end of the teens, DeMille had become Paramount’s most successful director, producing their most expensive film to date, The Ten Commandments in 1923. It cost approximately $1.4 million dollars.

Concerned with the cost, Paramount reigned in DeMille’s budgets leading to a break with the studio.

Between 1925 and 1928, DeMille became an independent producer at his own studio, Producer Distributer Corporation, releasing through Pathé.

Pathé Logo

1927 Pathé Logo

The King of Kings

The King of Kings (photo from vintage-ads.livejournal.com)

 This is where he made his most successful silent film, the 1927, The King of Kings.

The following year, Joseph Kennedy – the same person who would not lend him Gloria Swanson – joined the board as president of Pathé.

DeMille did not want to work for him. Offered a three-picture deal with MGM, he accepted.

THE CAST

Kay Johnson in Madam Satan

Kay Johnson (Nov. 29, 1904 – Nov. 17, 1975)

Kay Johnson, an accomplished stage actress before her film career, was spotted by DeMille in a production of The Silver Cord in California.

Impressed with her performance, he offered her a contract with MGM with her first film being DeMille’s Dynamite.  Including Madam Satan, Johnson appeared in six movies in 1930; and worked steadily through 1944.

Her final stage appearance was in the 1945 production of State of the Union. And her final film appearance was in the 1954 British film Jivaro.

In 1928, Johnson married actor, director, producer John Cromwell (m. 1928; div. 1946) and had two children; Jonathan Thomas Cromwell adopted in 1938 and actor, James Cromwell, in 1940.

Johnson never achieved the heights of fame she could have had, choosing to provide a stable home for her children over a life of fame in front of the cameras.

Reginald Denny in Madam Satan

Reginald Denny (Nov. 20,1891 – June 16, 1967)

Before films, Reginal Denny appeared on Broadway and used his trained singing voice on the legitimate stage in operetta.

Denny worked with John Barrymore in a Broadway production of Richard III in 1920.  They became good friends, starring in several movies together including the 1922 Sherlock Holmes which feature another star in tonight’s feature – Roland Young.

Though he appeared in a few movies in 1911 and 1912, his career officially started in 1915.  In silent films, he was cast as a typical young suburban American. But unbeknownst to most film audiences, he was British. With the advent of talkies, this became obvious and his career momentarily stalled going from leading man to featured actor.

Denny was able to adapt, and his screen personae became – usually – upper class British, or urbane gentleman. Examples can be seen in such films as the drama, Rebecca and the comedy, Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House.

Roland Young in Madam Satan

Roland Young (Nov. 11 1887 – June 5, 1953)

English born; Roland Young began his career in 1908 on the London Stage. By 1912 he was appearing on Broadway and juggling a successful stage career between London and America.

His American film debut was in the 1922 Sherlock Holmes along side tonight’s leading man, Reginald Denny.

Usually cast as the comedic second banana, he made just three silent films, and five talking pictures before being cast in Madan Satan. He would work again with Cecil B DeMille in the 1931, all talking, and second remake of The Squaw Man.

Young is probably best remembered as the milquetoast businessman, Topper in the movie of the same name, or displaying his dry wit as the licentious Uncle Willy in The Philadelphia Story.

Lillian Roth in Madam Satan

Lillian Roth (Dec.13, 1910 – May 12, 1980)

Stage mother Katie Rutstein groomed Lillian, and her sister Ann, for stardom. Sometimes billed as “Lillian Roth and Co.” or “The Roth Kids”, they worked the Vaudeville circuits, did some extra work in films and in 1917, six-year-old Lillian made her Broadway debut.

She eventually signed a contract with Paramount Pictures. At age 19, Roth was loaned out to MGM for tonight’s feature.

She left Paramount in 1933, possibly due to her growing dependency on alcohol.

Her father had been an alcoholic so the propensity to drink was probably there. Then, the sudden death of David Lyons, her first fiancé, in the 1930s from tuberculosis appears to be the initial trigger. Drinking, she found, made her feel better. At least momentarily.

Roth actively sought to take back control of her life through the years but repeatedly returned to alcohol as a way to cope.

Married and divorced 6 times, husband number 6, T. Burt McGuire, Jr., a recovering alcoholic himself, helped her to overcome her addiction and rebuild her career.

She is best remembered today for her 1954 autobiography, I’ll Cry Tomorrow, co-written with Gerold Frank, and the 1955 movie of the same name. With the  release of her book and the biopic, and as an outspoken advocate for destigmatizing this terrible disease, there was renewed public interest in her.

Roth worked continuously in theatre, concerts, night clubs and tours until a year before her death in 1980.

Her gravestone incudes the inscription, “As bad as it was, it was good.”

COLOR SYSTEM

Madam Satan Color

LA Times – Feb. 21, 1930

It was announced in the winter of 1930 that the picture would be largely shot in Technicolor.

Madam Satan Color

Motion Picture News – March 1, 1930

A few weeks later, MGM planned to use a rival color system and it would be almost entirely shot in Multicolor. But by the time filming began, the use of color had been reduced to one or two sequences.

Madam Satan Color

Variety – March 12, 1930

While we believe some scenes were shot in Multicolor, there is no evidence this footage was used in domestic release. And no contemporary review – that we could find – mentions any sequence in color.

With one exception:

Photo (1940) courtesy of theprincesstheatre.com.au

In 1933, three years after its release, an Australian review for a showing at the New Princess Theatre, Queensland, mentions the many beautiful scenes in color.

Madam Satan Color

1933 Australian Review

It was not unusual for foreign release prints to use alternate takes of scenes – in this case, possibly one with the color sequences.

ACT I

Madam Satan Cast

The Principal Cast of Madam Satan

The first 50 minutes of Madam Satan sets up the relationships between the main characters.

Angela and Bob in Madam Satan

The confrontation

Angela Brooks awakens to find her husband Bob has not returned from a night out with his friend, Jimmy Wade and showgirl Trixie, Bob’s side piece.

Confronting him, she realizes he’s lost interest in their marriage, and specifically her. And they agree to move on without each other.

Madam Satan

The scorned wife has other plans.

But Angela has other plans.

Madam Satan

The bedroom farce begins.

What happens next is a bedroom farce of who is who, and who is where.

Madam Satan

When rivals meet

During the mix ups and mayhem Trixie taunts Angela about giving Bob what he wants – which isn’t a decent woman.

Angela, in a bit of foreshadowing, declares “If he wants hot, she’ll give him a volcano.”

VISUALS

Madam Satan

Invitation to the zeppelin party.

Sets designed by Cederic Gibbons and Mitchel Leisen use subtle touches of deco elements in the domestic scenes, Act II, situated on a Zeppelin – because everybody’s friend has access to one – is decedent, surreal, and over-the-top.

Why? Because DeMille could.

It opens with a miniature set of a Zeppelin moored at an imaginary Jersey City airfield against the New York skyline.

Madam Satan Mooring Mast

Singing “We’re Going Somewhere”.

Guests arrive at the mooring mast singing, “We’re Going Somewhere”. As you can see in the slide, the lyrics are – gripping?

Madam Satan catwalk

Entering via a catwalk.

The Cat Walk from Madam Satan

Singing and dancing the “Cat Walk”.

Entering the Zeppelin via a catwalk, they begin singing the “Cat Walk” escorted by stewardesses dressed like – well, cats.

CGI Cat

Just say no!

And thankfully, not CGI ones!

Madam Satan zeppelin set

Zeppelin interior set.

Chrysler Building inspiration

Top of the Chrysler Building

The symmetry of the multi-level set consisting of staircases, arches and guide-wires appear to loosely mimic the top of the Chrysler Building.

Madam Satan deco touches

The chart room and the band stand.

In the Chart Room, cushions on the modern furnishings are upholstered in Art Deco fabric. And note how the sweep of the girders create a deco backdrop for the band stand.

CHOREOGRAPHY

Theodore Kosloff

“Ballet Electric” or “Ballet Méchanique”

Guests are treated to a bizarre modernistic “Ballet Electric” or “Ballet Méchanique” – depending on the source – danced by Theodore Kosloff, a renowned dancer, and actor.

In a nod to the importance of electricity in modern times, he magically appears with lightning bolts on, and around him.

DeMille hired Kosloff to choreograph Madam Satan but MGM insisted on Leroy Prinz – primarily to cut costs.

Madan Satan Ballet

Living Machinery

Its generally accepted that Kosloff choreographed the ballet as it is in his style. And, it is in no small part, influenced by the robot scene in Metropolis with supporting dancers dressed as parts of living machinery.

The use of over-head photography was not new to films. However, Busby Berkeley redefined the technique. His use of tightly synchronized routines to form patterns was unparalleled, blowing other productions out of the water.

Berkeley’s first film, Whoopee!, released at the same time as Madam Satan was a hit.

Madam Satan

Deco inspiration

If you get a chance to see the film, look for a woman carried in wearing a fantastical sweeping headdress reminiscent of Rene Lalique’s Victoire or Maurice Guiraud’s La Cometé.

Zeppelin Bar Carts

Zeppelin Bar Carts

And adding to the over-the-top entertainment, libations are brought to guest via zeppelin shaped bar cars driven by women in futuristic garb.

At least DeMille seems amused.

COSTUMES

Adrian - Madam Satan

Adrian Adolph Greenburg

Costume designer Adrian was tasked with bringing DeMille’s jazzy, hedonistic vision to life.

Madam Satan - Censor

Colonel Jason Joy (Photo form Alamy.com)

But many had to be modified to satisfy Hollywood censor. Jason Joy.

Joy worked closely with DeMille adding body stockings, more sequins, and fishnets to ensure the women were not revealing too much.

Adrian original sketch for Madam Satan

Original sketch vs. end product

In the original costume sketch, Madam Satan’s gown has deeper cut panels with barely-there coverage.

No doubt, adjusted to be more modest.

Madam Satan Costumes

Buck Rogers inspired?

Costumes for the male crew appear to be influenced by the popular and futuristic Buck Rogers from Amazing Stories Magazine.

Madam Satan Costumes

Bob’s tame compared to Trixie

Bob’s costume is tame compared to the exciting life he craves. It contrasts with Trixie’s barely-there ensemble – surely with a few added sequins.

And the fantasy doesn’t end there:

Madam Satan Costumes

The Tic-toc zeppelin ladies

Time flies when you’re having fun. Or is this the march of time?

Madam Satan Costumes

Contrasting leading ladies

Adrian deftly reinforces the contrast between the female leads with Madam Satan’s gown regally seductive as opposed to Trixie’s vulgarly overt exuberance of sequins and plumage.

Madam Satan Costumes

Contrasting the two sides of Angela

He does the same with the two sides of Angela / Madam Satan.

THE DISASTER

When disaster strikes - Madam Satan

Lighting bolt ex-machina

The frivolity ends when a lightning bolt “ex machina”, sets the zeppelin loose…

Abandon ship!

Abandon ship!

and the guests into a panic; forcing them to abandon ship.

Remember the Shenandoah!

Remember the Shenandoah!

Remember the Shenandoah!

Disaster inspiration.

There is little doubt that the tragedy of the Shenandoah influenced the fictitious disaster in tonight’s film.

Audiences would remember the actual destruction of the Navy airship, just a few years earlier. On September 3, 1925, turbulence tore the airship apart and 14 of the 43 crew members lost their lives.

SPECIAL EFFECTS

Pre-code special effects for Madam Satan

Before CGI special effects

In a world before CGI, studios needed a way to create special effects. Madam Satan used the Williams Process.

The Williams Process

The Williams Process

Patented in 1918, Frank D. Williams’ system allowed for integration of actors into moving backgrounds, It was first used in the 1922 Universal Film, Wild Honey.

DeMille also used it in 1922 for “Manslaughter”, and F.W. Murnau for Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans in 1927. The last film to use the Williams Process, or at least a version of it, was in 1964 for Mary Poppins.

The next part gets technical, but it’s interesting.

The Williams Process Step 1

The Williams Process Step 1

The Williams Process

The Williams Process Step 2

First, an actor in filmed in front of a black background. Two negatives are made, one is on regular film stock, and the other on high contrast stock.

The Hold-out and cover mattes for the Williams Process

The hold-out and cover mattes for the Williams Process

The latter is processed several times until it creates a solid black hold-out matte – a transparent background and a black foreground.

This is inverted to create a cover matte – with a black background and a transparent foreground.

The Williams Process

Hold-Out Mask overlayed on raw film stock & background filmed

The hold-out matte is overlayed onto raw film stock and the desired background photographed.

The masks in place for the Williams Process

Masks preventing exposure to the film

The hold-out matte was removed, the film rewound, and the cover matte is overlayed onto the newly filmed background preventing further exposure.

Williams Process

Original negative printed into negative space

The Williams Process

The final negative in the Williams Process

And the original negative is printed into the previously masked (unexposed) part of the film creating the final negative.

The Williams Process

The final product

While effective, it presented some technical issues, including light bleed which caused a halo effect around the actors.

PRODUCTION AND RELEASE

Cecil B. DeMille

Cecil B. DeMille (photo George Eastman Museum)

Production started on March 3rd, 1930 with a planned 70-day shoot, wrapping 11 days ahead of schedule on May 2nd.

It was MGM’s most expensive film of the year costing $980,000.

Out of town opening Madam Satan

Out of town opening Madam Satan

Suspecting audience’s waning interest in musicals, MGM opened it in Kansas City, September 12th, 1930; followed soon by other smaller markets before moving it to New York in early October.

In the end, it lost $390,000.

Released a year too late, public tastes had changed and musicals were on the decline. And the typical operetta convention of a mask and a fake French accent worked better on the stage where there is distance between the audience and the actors – less so in movies with close-ups.

REVIEWS

NYT Film Critic Mordaunt Hall in his, Oct. 6, 1930 review wrote:

Cecil B. De Mille’s latest audible film, ‘Madam Satan,’ is a strange conglomeration of unreal incidents that are set forth with no little technical skill.’ 

Robert Eber review Madam Satan

Robert Eber (Photo via X)

Robert Ebert stated:

I cannot believe that I have gone this long in life without basking in its total and heedless insanity. The film’s first half is a sparky romantic farce…slick, stylish and entertaining as can be but it is in the second half that it makes its grand leap towards genius/insanity… [It] could not possibly get any stranger … [Then] DeMille—comes in to transform it into a full-on disaster film…You have almost certainly never seen a film even remotely like “Madam Satan” before in your life.

A Song in the Dark

A Song in the Dark (photo via Amazon.com)

In his book about early musicals, A Song in the Dark, Richard Barrios, had this to say:

The Depression had begun to alter the national mood irretrievably while Madam Satan was still in production; by the time it reached theatres it was obsolete…How fitting that Madam Satan, the utmost example of the trend, winds up with a well staged blimp wreck; in one clean sweep this scene now seems to embody the end of the Jazz Age, the collapse of American prosperity, the death throes of early musicals, and, most literally, the flop of this last baroque gasp of twenties frivolity.

Cecil B. DeMille’s use of metaphor was usually painfully literal and obvious. This one, ironically, he never intended.

IN CLOSING

Madam Satan Posters

Just a few of the many graphics for Madam Satan

It’s been 95 years since its release. Is it a great movie? No. Is it worth the watch? We think so. And if you do see it, just go along for the ride and judge for yourself.

Thank you Madam Satan

Thank you for joining us!

Thank you!

 

Chris and Anthony (The Freakin’ ‘tiquen Guys)

Driving For Deco 2024 – Cincinnati Part Four: Xavier University Alumni Center

Vintage postcard of the Cincinnati Coca-Cola Bottling Plant.

Vintage postcard of the Coca-Cola Bottling Works, Cincinnati. Image from cardcow.com.

Leaving Cincinnati, heading home, we had one more stop to make, the Xavier University Alumni Center.

Alumni Center - former Coca-Cola

Alumni Center – former Coca-Cola Bottling Factory.

Neither Chris or myself are graduates of Xavier University, so why should we want to stop there? The reason, the Alumni Center is in a former, Streamline Moderne, Coca-Cola bottling plant from 1938. Having been a Coca-Cola collector in my teens and with my interest in 1930s architecture I told Chris I wouldn’t want to miss this opportunity to see the building.

The front facade of the Xavier University Alumni Center.

The front of the Xavier University Alumni Center, February, 2024.

The north side of the alumni center.

The northern facade of the Alumni Center of Limestone, glass block and aluminum.

A short article announcing the construction of a new two-story Coca-Cola bottling plant, designed by John Henri Deeken appeared in the May 27, 1937 Cincinnati Enquire. Its location would be on the west side of Woodburn Avenue in Cincinnati neighborhood of Evanston.  By July the final plans had been drawn up. Planned as a “show plant” the new $600,000 facility featured a special observation room allowing visitors to watch the bottling operations.

The exterior of Indiana limestone and glass block gives the building a clean and ultra modern appearance. Curved corners on each end of the front facade help in giving a streamline feel to the two-story building.

Main Entrance of former Coca-Cola bottling plant

Main Entrance of former Coca-Cola bottling plant

The verticality of the fluted, three story main entrance breaks up the low horizontal design and adds visual focal point to plant.

 

Sketch of the new Cincinnati Coca-Cola Bottling Plant.

Sketch of the new Woodburn Avenue Coca-Cola Bottling Plant. Cincinnati Post, July 21, 1937, Pg. 15.

The 1937 architectural sketch is almost identical to the finished building, with one obvious exception. It seems the original plans included a revolving weather beacon atop of the the main entrance.

Some sources claim that it was not built for fear it could be used for navigation by Japanese bombers for mainland attacks. Even with rising tensions between the United States and Japan in the 1930s, the plant opened a full three years before the attack on Pearl Harbor. And no planes at that time could fly from the west coast to Ohio without having to refuel along the way. Cost cutting during the 1937-1938 recession is a more likely reason for the elimination of the beacon.

Construction proceeded as planned with the plant opening at the end of November, 1938. Ads in the newspapers invited the public to an open house to see for themselves the bottling operations on November 27th and 28th. More than 30,000 people toured the new plant on those two days.

Ad inviting the public to tour the new bottling plant.

Advertisement from the November 28, 1938 Cincinnati Post inviting the public to tour the new Coca-Cola bottling plant.

In the early 1980s Coca-Cola closed the bottling plant after forty-four years. The building was falling into disrepair by the time it was purchased by Richard Rosenthal for his F&W Publications. Undertaking an 18 month restoration Rosenthal saved the building and placed it on the National Register of Historic Places.

Xavier University purchased the building in 2001 and eventually turned it into their alumni center. Entering the circular main lobby / reception room immediately transports one back to 1938.

Main Entrance Xavier University Alumni Center

Art Deco entrance to Coca-Cola bottling plant / Xavier University Alumni Center.

The Alumni Center lobby.

Xavier Alumni Center lobby.

A shiny, terrazzo floor of black and white with red stripes takes ones eyes through the entrance doors up to the reception desk and stairs up to the viewing mezzanine. The walls are of Marlite “marble” and olive wood with aluminum strips dividing the panels. Framing the former observation window are floor to ceiling glass blocks. This is a room that would not be out of place at Rockefeller Center or a 1930s ocean liner.

Deco Lobby - Xavier University Alumni Center

Deco lobby inside Xavier University Alumni Center

Looking back toward the main entrance in the reception lobby.

Reception lobby looking toward the main entrance and stairs to the second floor.

Opposite the reception desk and framing the main entrance doors are two curving staircases going up to the second floor.

On both sides of the stairs from the landing up to the second floor and incorporated into the railing are two wonderful metal and glass lamps.

Xavier University Alumni Center landing detail

View of landing from second floor

The two lamps have a simple but effective design that immediately captures the 1930s. Rising from a polished brass, tiered base is a chrome and frosted glass tube with three circular, glass plates capped by a stepped brass top and finial.

Also at the staircase landing is a bank of four series of windows looking out front of the fluted tower of the main entrance. Decorative brass grilles are placed in front of the windows on the outside. These windows flood the upper stairs and the second floor with natural light.

The view out the front windows from the second floor of Xavier University's Alumni Center.

Looking from the second floor out the front windows.

The second floor has the same terrazzo floor and Marlite “marble” and olive wood walls as the reception lobby. There is a display on the back wall directly in front of the stairs and the ceiling is tiered as it is directly underneath the dome of the main entrance tower.

Looking up the staircase from the landing.

Coming up the staircase from the landing to the second floor.

The display cases on the second floor.

There is one more decorative feature of the Alumni Center’s reception / lobby and that is the  John F. Holmer (1894 – 1962) mural. Holmer painted the mural, depicting the Cincinnati amusement park Coney Island, sometime between the mid-1940s and early-1950s.

The left and right sides of John F. Holmer’s mural.

Of course a Coca-Cola soda fountain and people enjoying Cokes are prominently featured in the mural. Although we didn’t stay long (no more than 15 – 20 minutes) I’m happy we took the time to see such a great building and nice that it has been so well cared for. Then it was back in the car and back to Rochester. But this wouldn’t be our only visit to a repurposed Coca-Cola bottling plant in 2024, but that is for a future blog post.

Looking up at the main entrance tower of the Alumni Center.

Xavier University Alumni Center’s main entrance.

Anthony & Chris (The Freakin’, Tiquen Guys)

Sources

Online

artworkarchive.com
xavier.edu

Written

The Cincinnati Enquirer
The Cincinnati Post